dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru2)
The interesting thing about Elly's lack of self-awareness is that it comes into play in one of the most infuriating arcs to ever involve Farley. We establish things with the pooch bulking up because the idiots are overfeeding him like the idiots they are. While we stop along the way to get a dumb joke about how Elly's horrible children are somehow making her obsessively wolf down their leftovers and a mean-spirited crack from John, we establish the first irritating premise: having to actually walk Farley is a horrible burden that no one wants but has to do anyway because Elly yells louder than they can.

The arc proper begins with Lizzie getting the leash tangled on something because she doesn't really know what she's doing. When she unhooks it, Farley runs off after a stray cat and Lizzie angrily blames Farley for her own lack of smarts and inability to control him. She then encounters Christopher and Richard who are pretty much as much use as a screen-door in a submarine owing to their tendency to feed into her fear that Elly and John will disown her for losing the dog. She sits there hiding away for an hour of misery only to get an angry lecture about wandering off when the dog has been on the porch the whole time.

Why does this anger me, you might ask? Is it that Christopher and Richard are useless jerks? Is it that Farley is a despised punching bag? Is it that Lizzie lives in fear of her mother's rages? Yes, but there's something else that really irritates me. Said irritant is the unpleasant realization that if Lizzie were to ever explain what went on, she would either not be believed (which is bad) or get an angry lecture about lying about what kind of person her mother is. Remember, Elly simply does not see the high-strung, thin-skinned, inflexible, short-tempered and judgmental nag everyone else sees when they think of her and forcing her to confront her real self anger her. Since we know Lizzie won't be forgiven for this, you can understand why I'm angry.
dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru2)
The problem with the Trash Bag John arc is that it reminds me of where we'll be in a year and a half: watching Elly yell at Farley because they unintentionally trained him to eat garbage. This is because their irritating refusal to keep track of where the poor dim animal is leads to the undesirable behavior of his rooting through the garbage looking for something yummy. This allows us to use the situation as sort of a template to explain why it is that the Pattersons are not good at problem solving. As always, the situation can be broken down into discreet steps.

First off, we have the undesirable behaviour I just mentioned. It's an infernal nuisance to have to pick up garbage that some animal has just spread all over the place so I can understand their frustration. What I also understand is that they set themselves up to fail by refusing to be especially vigilant owing to an unhappy tendency to assume that if they aren't thinking about him, he isn't doing anything.

Next, we have Elly's solution to the problem which, as almost always, is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the issue and a refusal to admit error. We start things off with her baffling assumption that Farley knows that she wants the garbage kept in bags and is just doing that to be mean to her, follow with her inability to understand that standing around holding a can of Alpo while screaming at him makes him think that dog food is screaming at him in a can and end with her belief that accepting that Farley can never understand what she's saying is a defeat.

We follow that with someone proposing a solution that can actually work and its graceless acceptance by people who see doing the sensible thing as giving up. This leads to Elly growling about kids wanting what other people have and eventually, her standing around bellowing NO!! while holding an ice scraper like a sceptre of futile rage when she cannot have her cake and eat it too.

Finally, we deal with the fact that there's another problem to contend with: idiot parents who, through their tendency to scream and holler, have raised passive children who don't understand that garbage doesn't walk itself to the bin. No sooner do they get the bin made than the kids turn it into a fort and we're back where we started. Nothing ever goes anywhere because the problem is not the dog, the problem is the idiot owners.
dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru2)
As you know, it's been my working theory that Marian's hatred of dogs led to great suffering for all. Every so often, I show up with another pious lecture about how she attacked a symbol of her shitty childhood and cursed the world with a daughter who grew up not being able to understand dogs. This led inevitably to her passing that ignorance down to stupid children who treated Farley like crap and that led to a stupid, preventable death that taught a child a bad lesson about mortality. Recent events have caused me to reconsider this position because the reason blaming Marian is bullshit is that Marian could have been a dog person and Elly still would have assumed that a dog is a short person in a suit because she's too dumb to live.

After all, we're dealing with a moron who wrote an angry poem TO a colicky six month old child who barely realized that he himself was a person begging him to pleeeeeease stop being sick and terrified and angry so she could pleeeeeease sleep because she will die thinking new borns have the agenda 'destroy Mommy'; getting her to admit that she could never talk Farley into doing what she wanted is as likely as getting her to admit that cats aren't evil monsters because they don't listen to her screaming at them any more than her children do. Elly does not want to admit that she's doing something futile and stupid based on total ignorance of the world because that would make her a moron.

Hell, she can't even admit that she should have done a better job of securing her property so he and the kids couldn't get out into open traffic to kill themselves. She talks about April toppling into the river and Farley being fated to die heroically there because the alternative is admitting personal responsibility when it comes time to assign blame. Unlike a Patterson, I would not have taken the bet that a heroic dog would do my parenting for me. After all, Farley could just as easily have dragged April under as buoyed her because a dog isn't a person.
dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru2)
As I've said before, most of the trouble Farley gets into stems from the fact that imbecile Elly sees him as a person in a dog suit and acts accordingly. She never seems to understand that she can never, ever talk him into doing what she wants and she seems to see his behaving like a dog as his deliberately defying her. This blind spot she has would be bad enough were she alone in thinking that admitting that he can't be lectured into compliance means that she's wasting her time pursuing a folly and also being monstrously unfair to an unfortunate animal that simply cannot know what it is he's doing to make her angry.

The problem is that she is not the only person in the house who seems to see Farley and the other pets as people in animal suits. As by way of example, we have Michael stupidly insisting on feeding him table scraps because he cares more about the pleading face of the opportunistic scavenger he's teaching Farley to be than the fact that he's literally killing Farley with misplaced kindness. We have Liz racing around trying to murder Shimsaa because she thinks that the cat is plotting to ruin her because the poor stupid thing wants attention and cannot understand what keyboards are and why not to jump on them. We have people standing around watching rabbits electrocute themselves because they're too dumb to understand that rabbits don't know what electrical current is. This, I should think, is why Phil doesn't see the use of animals in the house on purpose. Sadly, he too blames the dog for the problem instead of placing the blame where it belongs. More on that tomorrow.
dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru2)
As we now know, the 2016 wall calendar is going to be devoted to Lynn's hatred of the noisy toys that she would have found distracting as all Hell as a parent. From her wanting to straight-up murder the lovely person who gave her the plastic middle finger called a corn-popper to her baying at the moon about the havoc Evil Mira wreaked with her evil bouncy ball of beeping, we're going to get a lot of passive-aggressive sniping at children. Given that the current year's effort is devoted to her active hatred of being subjected to the same bullshit she made her parents suffer when she was a teenager, it seems only natural to assume that 2017 would be a means of reminding who ever still cares about the Pattersons that there's something she hates and by Damn, they are going to hear about it.

An upcoming Sunday strip in which Farley is bad and wrong and selfish because for some reason, he behaves as if he doesn't understand the English language provides me with an idea of what that subject matter will be: a year of Elly getting slowly unglued because she's an inept pet owner who won't admit that the creature she wasted years of her life screaming at or bargaining with had no idea what she was saying and never could. What shines through all of her interaction with the poor animal is that he had to be tormented not only by stupid children who thought he was a toy but also by a stupid woman who never understood that no matter how sincere she was, she was always going to be pounding sand in a rathole trying to talk her way into getting Farley to do what he wanted. Even in the kid's book that had him look for the bone, it was made obvious that while John, Lizzie and Mike understood how he behaved, Elly had no idea and didn't care to learn. Since we're supposed to be on the side of the ignorant idiot doing something futile, the poor pooch is in for another posthumous scraping.
dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru2)
It would seem that we're about to see yet another sequence wherein the Pattersons grumble and snort about how Farley is a great big furry imbecile because they're all really bad at understanding how dogs think. As you know, I use the strips in which Elly yells at Farley because he uproots her bedding plants as an example of this idiotic tendency. What I see is a dog who has a favorite warm spot on the property he likes to sleep on. For some reason that his brain simply isn't able to understand, there are plants growing out of it that simply have to be removed. Also for some reason, the loud creature who is loud yells angrily at him and sticks more plants in the ground to make him uncomfortable. He can no more understand the fact that the loud creature who is LOUD wants the plants there and him to nap elsewhere than he can fly to the Moon so screaming at him and insisting that he's trying to oppress Elly because he's bad is somewhat on the unfair side.

This is because none of the brains trust at the Pattermanse have ever figured out that a dog has something called an associative memory. What this means is that if you train him to sit when he hears the word sit in one room, his inability to make the sort of generalizations that human beings do means that you actually have to do that for every room in the house. Since the Pattersons don't take that to heart and would bray and moan about the unfairness of it if they did, we're in for another week in which they growl at him for their own ineptitude. If the reprints go on for another ten years, we'll see the end result of their massive incompetence: a dead dog by a riverbank and stupid people blaming a four year old for the fact that the dimwit in the ponytail doesn't know how to talk to kids and never bothers to learn.
dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru2)
Of course, the really interesting thing is that we should have already talked about the whole Greg and Jim thing about a year ago. As I've said before, Lynn would have done better to simply drop the first year of strips and started with straight reprints seven years ago. If she had, she wouldn't have had to mess up her continuity bringing Farley in too early and wouldn't have to insert filler strips to line up the holidays better.

If that were the case, we'd right now be dealing with the Pattersons trying to cope with his being an older dog who's starting to get health issues. The health issue in question this time next year is the hip dysplasia he's always had and how it's aggravated by their overfeeding him. They respond pretty much as one could expect when we have Mike try to deny the problem exists because he's too stupid to realize that dogs age faster than people do, Elly not letting the problem get in the way of her bellowing at the poor thing and John using it as a springboard for being an irritating wise-ass.

The reason that I mentioned all of this is that it still irritates me that Lynn pulled the inane stunt Beth talked her into when it'd have been a lot smarter to simply have the poor old fellow die of old age. I'm still on the fence on whether it would have been more true to life to have him simply die in his sleep and not have the fact been noticed or them having to take him down to be put down because he was old and sick and suffering but it would have taught a better lesson than his heroism. Unfortunately for all of us, her successful attempt to gain attention by sacrificing the credibility of Greg, Connie and Lawrence on the pagan altar of the heathen god Ratingsstunt had given her a taste for cheap theatrics that drew crowds while destroying the characters. It wasn't just Farley that died on that river bank, after all. Elly's credibility as a parent died, got cremated and put in an urn right next to the dog's ashes.
dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru2)
Of course, John is not the only person whose flaws are magnified by an over-reliance on the use of media archetypes. Knowing that his stupid envy of his children is made worse because of the idiot lantern is bad enough without having to remember that Elly isn't any better off. If anything, she's worse off owing to being around the kids more often. Piling media imagery on top of her default assumption that her children are little more than extensions of her will placed on this Earth to abase themselves in her name is akin to trying to put out a tire fire with kerosene in terms with the damage it did to the children.

The reason for this is that when Elly looks at her children, she's convinced that their reality of being born helpless and ignorant is unrealistic not just because she has to give up her precious free time raising them but because having them be the tiny adult joke machines would give her someone to talk to about things she's currently experiencing. Having to listen to Mike, Lizzie and April bore her with useless things like what's happening in their useless little child lives makes her feel bad because other people expect her to do something strange and care about something that she isn't experiencing. If only the kids could be made to realize that since Mommy no longer has to deal with it, it's no longer important.

That being said, it's not just her connection with her kids that got screwed over by the flickering blue parent. Most of the reason she's been a crappy friend to Connie is that she looks at a messed-up, angry and confused woman who doesn't know what she wants out of life and sees a horror freak from a day time drama having it all. Eventually, Connie had to leave town to get away from the damage her idiot gal pal did. It's like how she treated Annie like a leper because television told her that the only reason she didn't toss Steve out was because she caved. The other archetype of the matron having a club to beat a weak husband over the head with intimidated the Hell out of Elly and made her feel like a weakling and thus had to be ignored.

Finally, we have to remind ourselves that she still thinks that the reality of Farley's not being a dumb guy in a dog suit is unrealistic and unfair is that if she admits to being a loud, angry woman doing something futile and confusing, she'd have to cop to being stupid and bad and that would be bad.
dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru2)
As we know, Elly tends to fancy herself something of an amateur gardener. Most of the retcons in April and May have her gushing about her big plans to have the very perfect garden so she can demonstrate her creative side; the problem is that she has to coexist with Farley and his habit of barging in and wrecking things. As we see here, he has the habit of bedding down at a cozy spot right next to the wall that so happens to be where Elly likes to put her bedding plants. Now, you and I and everyone who understands how dogs see the world know for a fact that Farley isn't doing this because he's a BAD dog who wants to HURT Elly and make her SUFFER because he hates her. If the mental impulses that drive him to make his cozy little warm spot could be turned into English, we'd probably be told that for some reason that he can never understand, small plants keep appearing at that really great spot to sleep in. He doesn't know why they're there or what they're there for or why the woman keeps pointing at his perfect place to sleep and yelling at him as if he's done something wrong; all he knows is that if the plants are there, they have to be dug up.

As I said before when this came up, anyone who understands Elly well realizes that she will never accept the fact that a dog's memory is associative and not general. The same woman who can't admit that she can't plead with him in the hopes that if she's sincere enough, he'll finally understand something that his brain isn't built to can't possibly put her bedding plants somewhere he doesn't like to go. Then again, we are dealing with the creation of an idiot woman who doesn't understand that a dog isn't a man in a costume. Her need to anthropomorphize him is meant to turn him from a normal dog being screamed at by an ignorant lunatic into just another person making Elly's life worse because he's too stupid and mean-spiritied and selfish to help. The problem with this is that since people aren't generally as stupid as Lynn hopes they are, the reality of his situation shines through as clearly and horribly as the problem I have with Elly's inability to get that her inevitable stupid, ill-informed and self-centered over-reaction to every little God-damned thing and over-weening need to make every little God-damned thing about her and why everyone hates her and wants her to suffer is why her children never confided in her.
dreadedcandiru2: (Indignant Candiru)
The problem with trying to apply common sense to the whole "Death Of Farley" situation is that Lynn seems to have certain fixed preconceptions as to how the world works and tends to react to any sort of murmur of disagreement with either a flippant remark or a sullen accusation of persecution. While I have made a bit of a meal of her not seeing how much drama she could derive from the Pattersons having to take Farley down to the vet to be put down, it seems to me that her inability to see that they'd be stuck with a difficult and painful decision that resulted in a heart-wrenching necessity that they'd be dealing with for years to come isn't the only means by which her lack of vision screws things up.

First off, we have to deal with her insistence that There Must Be Continuity as a means of stiff-arming objections to the concept that any new pet the Pattersons might get when they feel up to pet ownership again must be Farley's offspring. The objection seems to be that if they just go down to a shelter to pick up some random dog whose origins they don't know, any connection to Mrs Baird would be lost and so on and so forth. This despite the fact that most of the people who cried when Farley died had to wait until 2008 to learn where the Pattersons got Farley in the first place.

Second, she doesn't seem to want to face up to how stupid, reckless and unsympathetic the Pattersons in general and Elly in particular ended up looking. This habit of hers of assuming that people understand things as she does failed her when it ended up looking as if Elly was too damned stupid to understand how to talk to her child, too lazy to bother neutering Farley and too blasted cold-hearted to realize how scared April was after nearly drowning. All Elly seems to have learned is that for reasons that no one would ever be able to comprehend, nearly dying made April clingy and panicky around water.

Lastly, it looked to all the world that they all just shrugged, said "Oh, well. Farley's dead. That's too bad but we've got a new dog so we don't really have to care" owing to her seeming belief that showing the Pattersons feeling strong emotions would scare people away. We had to contend with the same noise when she told people off about how boring the Fauxposal had to be for much the same reason.
dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru2)
As all of the strips that have as their premise the self-serving and stupid idea that Elly's children must actually be out to destroy her, it's sort of obvious that Lynn really doesn't understand how a lot of things work. Since she's sort of lazy, sort of childish and sort of gullible, it is fairly obvious that she relies on the imagery from network television to help explain things to herself. What appears to be happening is that she assumes that no one would let the writers say things that weren't true despite the fact that the only reason that the authorities would actually step in is if whatever nonsense is being promulgated would offend enough taxpayers to cause a disturbance.

What this meant to the strip is that in the very early years, we had to contend with a rather derivative cast of characters. As by way of example, it's fairly obvious that Mike started out as an evil genetic experiment in which she combined Linus Van Pelt with Dennis the Menace. Later on, of course, she turned him into a means by which she could nag Aaron about how everything he did disappointed, confused and angered her. The problem is that while she was able to make her human cast comprehensible by turning them into means by which she could nag real people, she was never quite able to figure out how dogs think despite having a veterinarian as a relative. This means that Farley died pretty much as the bad photocopy of Scooby Doo he always was. Instead of asking Beth what a real dog might do, Lynn remembered what cartoon dogs do without realizing that her former bosses were under no obligation to warn the public that in real life, a severely off-type Great Dane isn't actually a really dumb human being in a dog suit.

The reason that this becomes a problem of sorts in the Middle Years is that Elly can never quite wrap her head around the way Farley thinks. What we're going to see as the years go on is Elly either screaming at him or pleading with him to get him to do what she wants because she just doesn't know enough about dogs to realize that that will not work. As by way of example, he can't connect his uprooting those plants that keep showing up on the nice cozy spot in the front yard where he likes to sit on warm summer days with the angry yelling the alpha female carrying more plants always does any more than he can make the logical inference that he isn't allowed to mark territory in the yard no matter how many times they scream at him when he's about to do so. All Elly ever managed to do over the years is frighten and confuse him because she won't understand him.
dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru2)
The interesting thing about the endless struggles Elly had co-existing with Farley is that just as she looked back at her career of being a stifling, inflexible, narrow-minded, paranoid, fearful, hypocritical, spineless monster martyr Mom who made a point of not listening to her children and saw a loving, caring, firm and fair super=parent, she looks back at her life of treating Farley as a shaggy, stupid, destructive hindrance who refused to understand English out of spite and sees a friend to all living things despite it being quite clear that she has no idea that she did actually train the creature to flee the loud, booming voice that was always angry and always wanted to hurt him.

The reason that I mention this is that it very well could have ended up that Farley 'adopted' another family on his peregrinations; what is more, said new family would actually treat him like a pet instead of a punching bag. This would lead to a rather interesting scenario in which the Pattersons would have to contend with their self-concept being set against something that they've tried to avoid seeing all their lives: the reality of what they are. As by way of example, the sole reason he's there in the first place is because Mrs Baird slipped a clutch and forgot that pets aren't supposed to teach children to be responsible. She might have thought otherwise but any major dude could have told her that Farley was just another thing that Mike waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanted until he got bored with it and that Farley would pay the price. This means that when those responsible award the other people ownership of the poor creature, we can start in early with all the stupid blathering about how the law is an ass because it doesn't give slithering, undeserving vermin like the Patterswine a pat on the head for being stupid and blind and malicious.
dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru2)
The odd thing about this and all of the other arcs in which Farley pulls a runner is that at some point or another, someone fears that someone stole the poor creature. Elly saw this as a possibility in the horrible sequence that got turned into the book Farley Follows His Nose,, she saw this as a possibility when Animal Control picked him up and one of the Nichols children raised it as a possibility when Farley ran away from Lizzie and wound up on the front porch looking stupid. The interesting thing about this is that aside from the fact that there are crazy or evil people in the world who would just plain glom onto him for shits and giggles, there's another reason that the Pattersons never seem to see. After all, Farley is a pure-bred Old English sheepdog with a known and recognized pedigree. I personally can think of any number of people who'd think that the offspring of a known champion would be something that they simply must have, the law and previous ownership be damned so it doesn't take a genius to realize that the idea that someone would want to grab onto him and take him away from the Pattersons is a legitimate concern.

That being said, the only person who sees it as a real threat is Elly because she sees it as a means of showing hatred for nice families. Given that Farley's physical and emotional well-being are as secondary a concern as those of her children, the idea that some maniac is torturing the poor animal to death just for kicks means far less than the idea that she, Elly Patterson is being inconvenienced. What makes her skewed priorities almost bearable is that at least she can see that someone might want him for some purpose even if that purpose escapes her. To everyone else, the idea that what she and everyone else see as a shaggy, stupid, messy, smelly, filthy lump could be valuable to anyone is completely alien. What they don't seem to realize is that this sort of thinking could have backfired on them if Farley had decided to adopt another family.
dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru2)
As we all know, Lynn spent an ungodly amount of time five and a half years ago engaged in promoting the return of Farley to the strip. This is because one thing that she was aware of is that most of her fanbase remember one thing about him: his "heroic" exit from the strip. While it's true that we got a lot of mileage out of commentary about how everybody cried when he died saving April from her refusal to realize that she's not supposed to remember being lied to, it's also true that the people who expected him to be a sort of beloved fixture as well as a Canadian Content version of Lassie ended up being disappointed. After all, they had no way of knowing that Lynn used him as a means of expressing her belief that dogs are shaggy, stupid, smelly, dirty lummoxes who refuse to understand English no matter how sincere we poor, long-suffering pet owners are and are willed on us to keep us from the public sphere by cheating cheater husbands who cheat in the first place. I should think that this need to say "Dogs are stupid, right?" to a cohort of people who thought that Farley wasn't put on this Earth to be the butt of jokes about how having pets equates solely to Elly suffering because her family hates her soooooooooo much, they leash her to a stupid creature to keep her from expressing herself is pretty much most of the reason why Lynn's garage is filled with stuff she can't sell. They want to be part of the heroic legacy, not to aid and abet Lynn's need to avenge herself on something she had killed merely to avenge herself on her ex.
dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru2)
As you all know, we've just begun another arc in which Farley is put in needless danger because his foolhardy and incompetent owners cannot be asked to do anything like understand him or anticipate how he's going to behave. Just as we have to put up with the annual "Elly sees Christmas as means of nailing herself to her cross" arc and the endless loads of dirty laundry, we have to bear witness to the poor dog being turned into a sort of punching bag because it's funny watching a big, shaggy goof get mauled by idiots who think that he's a very stupid man in a costume. Eventually, he dies of bad pet ownership. The reason that I mention this is that [livejournal.com profile] babsbybend has figured out something that should shed some light on things. It seems to her that since Farley never really had any sort of emotional bonds to the Patterson family, he really isn't 'their' dog as such and would go whereever it is food might be found. This makes of him a canine analogue to the rest of them. Just as he's simply the dog that happens to live and stay there, the other people are a group of unrelated people who happen to share a surname and address. They look like a family to the outside world but their living the compartmentalized lives they live mean that they aren't. He's just another isolate along for the ride.
dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru2)
The odd thing about the very stupid New Years' party of Mike being allowed to set off the smoke detector because John and Elly are too stupid and lazy to clean up after themselves is that it leads to another exercise in John and Elly being too stupid and lazy to make sure that Farley doesn't wander around loose. The end result of this failure of the imagination results in his finally getting a license and collar so that Animal Control may know who can't control their animal. That being said, it will be only a matter of time before Elly's need not to stick to any sort of discipline results in Farley's once again getting loose. Eventually, a tale of heroism will be woven from the tapestry of idiocy and sloth that is Patented Patterson Pet Ownership.
dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru)
Of course,  it's not just people that Elly doesn't understand. As the strip and the kids' books remind us, Elly doesn't understand Farley in the least. This comes into play when she and John try giving him a bath. We start off with John and Elly being inconvenienced because Farley has learned to run and hide when someone says the word 'bath', baffled by his resistance to being shoved into a tub filled with lukewarm, soapy water to have the loud human female who shrieks at him all the time manhandle him and scrub away the pleasant smell of good, honest dirt and traumatized that he behaves like a great big ingrate and rolls in the filth like a selfish idiot.

At no point in the proceedings does Elly ever stop to consider anything from the dog's point of view. Good ol'Farley will never understand English on the same level you and I can but he has learned to associate the sound of the word "bath" with being shoved into water and having his scent scrubbed off of him. While he does know that for some reason that couldn't possibly make sense to him, the humans like the unpleasant smell he has after he gets dunked into the scary tub full of scary water, he doesn't especially care because he wants to smell 'right' and immediately treats himself to a satisfying roll in the dust to get rid of that awful stench the people like. Why it is that he isn't allowed to smell the way he wants to is something that he isn't able to understand.

He shares this inability to understand the world around him with Elly. She can read books about animal behaviour, she can be told how dogs will act, she can watch dog trainers on television but she refuses to accept their advice because she doesn't think that his never being able to think like a person is especially fair. Just as the point of the Mystery Virus arc is all about how horrible it was that Elly had to take care of a sick kid, all the shrieking she does at Farley is all about how terrible it is that she has to change how she behaves because a dog won't.
dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru)
The sad part of this horrific arc is that Humphrey isn't the only defenseless animal whose endangerment at the irresponsible hands of imbecile Elly was meant to be comic fodder. After all, Lynn seems to think that Farley's getting yelled at, kicked at, fed stuff dogs should not eat, being allowed to wander around at large and thereby risking getting run over, getting skunked, shaved bald and being made to travel two thousand bloody miles in an airless trailer so as to crisp-fry his brains and so forth is loads of laughs. Why, it's almost as much fun as having April's pet rabbit and his addiction to chewing electrical cords.

The reason that Lynn keeps on doing this seems to be fairly simple and can be found in the "Mike is bad because he isn't sharing the hamster with Lizzie" strip. We and Michael see a small, defenseless creature that risks getting mangled by a small child who cannot know better. Lynn and Elly see an object that must be shared no matter what the cost. Since animals aren't really real to Lynn, the idea that their suffering is somehow wrong doesn't seem to be able to occur to her; since she can't identify with their pain, her response to being asked to is one of bafflement that people make such a big deal over nothing.
dreadedcandiru2: (Default)
In my haste to ascribe the Pattersons' failure to learn from their mistakes on their inability to remember bad experiences that could help them instead of simply confirming their persecution complex and validating their sense of entitlement, I forgot to mention another problem. For them to learn from a problem, they first have to remember that they caused the problem in the first place. The example that comes most readily to mind is the final preventable catastrophe Farley was subjected to: his dying of a heart attack after pulling April out of that river behind the house. As you will recall, Elly said that April toppled into the river as if it could not have been prevented at all.

Since we're dealing with a woman who doesn't believe in taking any sort of precaution because they aren't guaranteed to work exactly one hundred percent, she looks at something we would see as being preventable and insists that it isn't. In her mind, she's absolved from blame because April and that stream were destined to collide and no lock in the world could have prevented it. It is thus with Farley getting sick because he ate garbage; he was meant to suffer because Elly can't prevent things.

What makes this sort of thing all the more annoying is that people are willing to believe her. Most, if not all, of the people on Coffee Talk who cry when Farley died don't burn with the anger that they should be feeling about the imbeciles whose witlessness caused his death. They're more inclined to blame April for opening the gate than Elly for shrugging and thinking that since locks can fail, she only had to say something vague and not have to do anything else.
dreadedcandiru2: (Snarky Candiru)
Now to get back to the current arc, there are real-world problems that I have with it. Said problems are all related to a statement that I expect Lynn made at one point: "HUM!! The people who write me angry letters about how shabbily the Pattersons treat a cartoon dog are as baffling as the ones who think that Farley might die. Why do people feel sorry for him?"

The reason that I suspect that she said something along those lines is that seems likely that Lynn never really stopped to consider how people might react to the arc. This is probably an extension of what looks like a generalized inability to look at things through other people's eyes. In her mind, she's telling the story of a dog who got sick as the result of his being a what she thinks a dog is: a messy, stupid, shambling clown of an animal that can't be controlled but only reacted to. The idea that people might see this as the result of the bumbling of his long-suffering owners baffles her because of her default assumption that everyone thinks much like she does.


dreadedcandiru2: (Default)

September 2017

3 456 789
101112 13141516
1718192021 22 23


RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 25th, 2017 08:32 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios