dreadedcandiru2: (Default)
In one of my recent entries about the Lynnsights, I neglected to mention something that I assumed to be a given. After all, it's not really all that difficult to see that most of what Lynn does is based on the need to have people feel sorry for her and forgive her her more irritating habits. Let's see who she sees as having oppressed her:

  1. Her mother: When you take what Lynn has said about the woman and sum it up, you get the following: "My mother expected me to behave like a human being instead of a selfish little monster and to do things that bored me....PITY ME!!"
  2. Her teachers: We get much the same need to be pitied because of their insistence on her not acting like a destructive, defiant jerk as well as applying herself to things that bored her. Further pity is required because they didn't take the time to look past the sullen need to attack anyone who allows as how she doesn't know what's good for her to find the nice kid buried under the screwed-up twit.
  3. Her brother Alan: When she's not whimpering for sympathy because he was allowed more freedom despite being younger just 'cause he has a penis, she's moaning because her parents never admitted that he had to obey her.
  4. Men in general: Every so often, Lynn whinnies about the crazy, no-way fantasy world-wide conspiracy of all men everywhere to destroy her freedom of expression and to chain her to a stove.
  5. Her ex-husbands: When they're not cheating on her, they do things that annoy her. This means that we are asked to pity her.
  6. Other women: I've already talked about the other super-crazy impossible fantasy cabal of all that attractive women in the world to steal any man Lynn might be interested in so that they can laugh at her as she dies old, miserable, ugly and alone so I shouldn't really have to repeat it.
  7. Her children: Since she believes in the ridiculous myth of the writers' trance, it shouldn't be much of a surprise that we're expected to lavish pity on her because they want her to waste her time on the unimportant things that bore her called 'their childhoods.' Well, that and she's expected to also clean.
  8. Hating Haters who Hate: When she's not dealing with awful people and their baffling need to have their personal lives not appear on the printed page, she's bleating about the need to be pitied because horrible, cruel, unfair people expect the too much of her that is called taking the time to not churn out crap.


I can further simplify things by saying that when she's not whining for sympathy because she's expected to deal with things she finds distasteful or boring, she's moaning "Please pity me" because she's a narcissistic jerk whipsawing between delusions of invincibility and over-the-top self-loathing. Given how inattentive Kool-Aid Nation is, all they see when she's being held to account is someone being picked on so the mother hen impulse is wasted on someone they'd cross the street to avoid were she as big a part of their daily lives as they think she is.
dreadedcandiru2: (Default)
As we all know, this continent is populated by the sort of person who has convinced himself that since his version of religion isn't being rammed down everyone else's throats by the State, Christianity as a whole is being backed into a corner. This more or less makes him the bible-wielding equivalent of a John Patterson who assumes that since good taste, common decency, the Constitutional liberties men have fought and died to defend so that the producers of police procedurals can grumble about being hindered by said 'technicalities' and other inconveniences restrain him from tyrannizing others with impunity, he is being tyrannized. The most visible public symptom of this refusal to admit that not everyone else is a vicious monster sick with the need to mind everyone else's business is the irrational bleating about a crazy, no-way fantasy war on certain holidays. We thus have the depressing holiday tradition of listening to bellowing dullards thundering witlessly on to their flock about the evil humanists and their evil need to abolish Christmas and Easter while ignoring the inconvenient fact that other fundamentalists regard the holidays they regard as being endangered as pagan ceremonials to be feared and hated.

The reason I mention said irritating nitwits (who seem to have too much power and influence in this world) is that most of them are fairly thrilled to see any sort of reference to the allegedly endangered holidays in print media and don't mind saying so. It doesn't seem to matter what the person is saying about the holiday, all that matters is that it be mentioned so that they can bleat witlessly about a safe haven from the imaginary conspiracy that they fear. We were subjected to a recent outbreak of this idiocy when they saw Mike being totally confused by the doctrine of original sin. For every one person who was enraged that Mike did not writhe on the floor in self-loathing because, yes, he was a filthy sinner and needed Christ to save him from eternal torment, there seem to be a hundred who removed Lynn's "I don't get this whole 'born in sin' thing" and plugged in their own belief systems because they wanted to see a kindred spirit.
dreadedcandiru2: (Default)
As we all know, there are a lot of people who complain bitterly about Lynn's blithely forcing them to confront the question of the reality of Santa Claus before they're ready to have that little chat with their kids. It saddens me to see such heartfelt letters of disapproval knowing that they'll be shrugged off without a thought.

This is because I know something that they do not: Lynn isn't overburdened with regret about the things that she does. The same woman who pleads with us to love Anthony cheerfully informs her fans that if a child is old enough to read her strip, he or she is old enough to have figured out the truth; if that isn't the case, she cannot and will not be held accountable for the consequences.

This sort of smug stupidity takes a darkly comic turn when she jabs a finger in the air and blames the media for teaching her children to curse and destroying their respect for her. First off, she is the media to those who want to keep Santa in Christmas; second, like Santa, the source of cursing and disrespect is a lot closer than she thinks it is. Like most children, I should think that they picked up the choicer expressions from unaware parents and, well, it's sort of obvious that her antics and the fact that she spent next to no time raising them might explain why she didn't get the obedience she wanted.
dreadedcandiru2: (Default)
As a long-term student of the strip, I've noticed that Lynn's fans tend to want to use it to validate their lives; as [livejournal.com profile] howtheduck has said many times, the people who cry buckets of tears because April killed Farley and who make snippy commentary about how it's just make-believe when our point of view makes a point that bothers them do is read it on the most superficial level imaginable. When they see the Patttersons do something they've done, they're delighted to see their lives reflected back to them by the dead-tree, four-panel mirror that is For Better Or For Worse.

That being said, you would think that they might at least trouble themselves to get the name of what it is they're defending from the nasty people who they've convinced themselves to be unable to enjoy anything because they dare to think about what they see and read right. Most of the "Stop being mean, low-down people who think and reason and join us in being happy and mindless" crowd call Lynn's daily dose of poisoned syrup a column instead of its proper name of comic strip. Coffee Talk itself is a column or would be were in on the printed page; the strip itself is still a strip and nothing but a strip.

Not, of course, that Lynn would let anything that said anything remotely like this see the light of day; she seems to prefer the fawning praise of the inattentive and silly who tell her to not strive to better herself to the harsh-to-her voices of who expect her to live up to her potential.
dreadedcandiru2: (Indignant Candiru)
You can't help but read some of the notes defending Lynn's right to write whatever she wants without sometimes coming away with the impression that you're dealing with the doting parents of a clearly disadvantaged child who conflate being asked to push her past certain limits with being needlessly cruel to her. This is why I sometimes feel like I'm the head nurse in a medical drama being yelled at by teary-eyed parents for picking on poor little Lynnie when I know that if she pushes herself harder, she'll be better off for it. The reason for this, I think, is that they get the gist of some of her notes and choose to interpret them in the way Lynn approves of and give her permission to fail.

That being said, one of the greatest examples of this sort of plea for negative tolerance that isn't the please-Please-PLEASE-love-Anthony letter is a recent comment in which she described herself as basically being a pawn of her creations; the idea that she's in charge of what they do and say because they're people she made to do with as she sees fit seems to be as alien to her as it does to Michael. When we look at something like that, we think that she could benefit from a new perspective on things; when the Coffee Talk squadron reads something like that, they probably shrug and treat her like any other person who's trying her best despite being horribly disadvantaged.
dreadedcandiru2: (Default)
As you know, Lynn has for the last few years had a letter column on her home page that she mistakenly calls her blog. The interesting thing about it is that it proves a point that I've made far too often for my peace of mind; you see, she can make no statement so absurd, reveal no bias too ridiculous or create no plot twist so insane that she won't have someone pipe up and congratulate her for it. As an example, her recent simpering that Lawrence wants to throw a monkey wrench in his mother's love life because he's selfish and wants her to be alone resulted in smug agreement from one of her favorite lickspittles. Similarly, we have people who don't see that Thérèse is far more sinned against than sinning, people who want April waterboarded because she selfishly demands that her voice be acknowledged than put her faith in people they don't want to admit are faithless, people who agree that the whining, negligent jerk Mike is a great dad and even people who think that the morose, clueless, humorless toad Assthony is a great catch. The reason I follow it so closely is the same reason I don't simply abandon following the strip: I like trainwrecks!
dreadedcandiru2: (Default)
The notes attached to a recent strip remind us of a belief that has long haunted Lynn; in them, she allowed as how she's always been ten pounds over some perceived ideal weight. It doesn't matter that she's a tiny woman who looks exactly like the "after" picture in a commercial for a weight-loss plan, she sees herself as being fat-fat-fat-fat-fat. The problem is not just, however, that she's got a screwed-up self image or that she's trolling for sympathy from Kool-Aid Nation; the problem is that Kool-Aid Nation thinks that Elly is a self-portrait despite her constantly telling them otherwise. Were they to realize that she's more like Connie than Elly, they'd tend to ask the same disturbing questions and get the same not very reassuring answers as we do; it's sort of appalling to have to remember that the woman has such a distorted self-image.
dreadedcandiru2: (Default)
I think that it's safe to say that I've proven that The Pattersons are unabashedly awful people; their greeds, their hatreds, their fears and their follies have been so thoroughly laid bare that it's redundant to call them horrible people. The baffling thing is that the crouching vermin are beloved by thousands. There are a lot of reasons why this is. The first reason is that there's a phenomenon known as validation. When people see something that they do in real life appear on television or in a movie or comic strip, they feel better about their own lives because they have proof that they're not alone in sharing an experience. This is, of course, why people tell Lynn that she must have a camera in their houses. It seems to me that there are several reasons why they don't go out of their way to say that Lynn doesn't have a camera in their house when the Pattersons do something vicious, self-serving and idiotic. Bear with me as I list them.
  1. Inattention: It's only when you sit down and read a lot of strips in succession that you really start to notice how stupid, selfish, cruel, entitled, gutless and just plain awful the Pattersons are. Since most people don't spend much time thinking about what they read, they don't see that they're cheering on cretins and monsters.
  2. Apathy: The people who bleat 'get a life' tend to refuse to see that Foob isn't simply drawings on a page; the idea that people take this to heart baffles them owing to a lack of respect for the medium and an unwillingness to see that others do take things to heart. The problem I have with that point of view is that we live in a world wherein children die because they imitate things they see on television; that in itself is proof of the power fiction has over impressionable minds.
  3. Revisionism: The Yahoo group that used to be fairly active once had a lot of posts that say that we're not seeing the whole Patterson story; they're willing to admit that we do see a lot of horrible things but, hey, Lynn can't show us everything. For every awful deed that makes for drama, there's a lot of boring virtue we don't get to watch.
  4. Willful blindness: For every one Coffee Talker who's willing to admit that the Pattersons have done questionable things, there are a hundred who don't want to have their heroes' motives questioned. As I've said before, critical thinking is neither welcome or appreciated owing to a belief that only bad people who can't enjoy life criticize things.
  5. Bigotry: There are a lot of people out there who not only know that the Pattersons do horrible things willingly, they don't see them as being in the wrong. The sort of person I'm thinking of honestly does see that Therese is wrong to expect Anthony to live up to the agreement they made and does wish that April would get a slap in the mouth for 'disrespecting' Elly. They also agree that Paul Wright is made of snow and would melt if he lived in the city and that the sort of Magical Minority that Eva Warzone, Luis Refugee and Shan...non are are what real visible minorities are like.


It's sort of irritating to have to remind myself that the Pattersons are beloved of the oblivious, the ignorant and the unreconstructed; that's because it used to attract those in the know.
dreadedcandiru2: (Default)

As we're bearing witness to, this current arc shows us Connie at her lowest ebb, her least sympathetic. That's because we see a woman who built up an elaborate and essentially dishonest fantasy relationship based on casual sex and polite but essentially meaningless conversations faced with a dilemma: should she pursue the matter further and ignore the son who pines away from her for so long as it takes to get thoroughly humiliated or cut her losses, admit her folly and rush home while cursing herself for losing sight of what really matters? Since she chose the former option, we start to see that Connie has a tendency to put her needs ahead of those of her children when push comes to shove. She is thus a character with an obvious and well-defined flaw and, as such, joins such other heroes as Elly-the-ungrateful, John-the-entitled, Mike-the-envious, Liz-the-clingy and Anthony-the-filthy-abomination. As we all of us know, these people are not the nice, friendly bunch we thought they were when we only spent a minute or two thinking about the strip; they are, instead, a bunch of low-lives with crippling defects that hamper their ability to live their lives. This might sound a bit odd but I often ask why Lynn doesn't simply embrace their assiness and make it a selling-point. She could say "Look at my family of anti-heroes! They make you feel good 'cause you're not them!" This, of course, would mean that she herself spends more than thirty seconds thinking about her strip. Since she doesn't, she joins Inman and Ryan W from Seattle in thinking that the Pattersons are a swell bunch of guys.

dreadedcandiru2: (Default)

As you know, most of the people who write letters that approve of the Pattersons' wacky adventures do so because they find the similarities between life in Milborough and reality reassuring. It validates their own existences when they see Elly slaving grimly away; what's more, they tell themselves that the more questionable behavior is not as real as the things they like. This is why we get letters that explain that the nastiness we see is only part of the story; even if that were true, the over-emphasis on negativity should be setting off alarm bells inside their heads. I can see something in the immediate future that they might have difficulty processing though: Connie's not coming straight home after hearing about Lawrence's broken leg. Most of them probably would assume that Connie would, in fact, abandon her pursuit of Phil and rush home to comfort her son; the idea that she would not do so so as to live out some screwy fantasy might not occur to them and, given that they're for the most part regular people who haven't had enough exposure to Patter-history to hate the Foobs, probably wouldn't appeal to them. We, after all, live in a world wherein Connie could simply hop the red-eye to Toronto and take charge of things; the idea that she won't because she regards her son's health and happiness as an obstacle to her own needs is going to alienate those who don't try to come up with an alibi. We could hear about strikes at the airport or a blizzard blocking the road or anything to force Connie to stay where she wants to. None of the more loyal fans would want, I think, to believe that she'd stay there if it were sunny and warm.

dreadedcandiru2: (Default)

When I first saw last Sunday's strip, I expected a certain reaction on Coffee Talk based on what I'd seen before. Let's use the strip that had Elly steamroll Michael into agreeing that throwing away the rest of his Halloween candy was a good thing as an example of said trend. We started with people who think like we do angrily denouncing her for being a bully, ogre, idiot and twerp; this was followed by the usual reminders that it was simply a comic strip and thus not worrying about and letters that explained that we didn't see what we thought we did. The consensus amongst Lynn's defenders is that Elly thought she was helping John in his campaign to protect the family's teeth. This led me to expect that we'd have seen letters that referenced Amber alerts as well as comments from retail workers who resent the implication that they're free babysitters for the Ellys of the world followed by rebuttals that stated that a) Elly was actually in the same theater as Mike only we couldn't see her, b) if Lynn says they're old enough to go by themselves, they're old enough to go it alone, c) let them have childhoods, pickyfaces or d) get a life, they're not actually real unless they do something I like. What we saw was one letter that questioned Elly's parenting chops floating in a sea of letters about everything else. This tells me that whoever's in charge of screening Lynn's e-mail didn't want to touch this with a ten-foot pole but didn't want it to look like the subject was being totally ignored; they're probably waiting for the heat to die down so they can move on.

dreadedcandiru2: (Default)

As expected, the funeral for Frank the dead fish was maudlin, silly, twee, bathetic and manipulative. We can thus think of him as a tiny version of Wacko Jacko whose demise made me fear that CNN would stick a webcam in the man's coffin so we could see the Gloved One decompose. The motives are even the same; just as Jackson's death is the best thing that could have happened to his career, Frank's burial in a Birks coffin distracts Lynn's devoted fans from how awful a parent Elly is. We can look forward to any number of silly letters that simper that, despite her confiscating Mike's candy out of idiot malice, Elly actually does love him after all. The only question that faces us now is how bad the grammar and spelling will be.

dreadedcandiru2: (Default)

[livejournal.com profile] clio_1 noticed something odd about John yesterday. That odd thing is that John sees the things that Elly does as having a positive value, as being important in and of themselves, as being able to provide meaning to someone's life. Unlike Elly, who doesn't think that her life as a stay-at-home-mother has any purpose, he actually does think and goes out of his way to state that raising children, cooking, cleaning and the rest of the housework that she does is a worthwhile way to spend one's time; he's thus baffled by the notion that she denigrates all the good and useful things she does as a waste of time. The idea that housework is time lost is not something that seems to occur to most of the people who tell Lynn that she has a camera in their house either; they may sympathize with Elly when she gets frustrated because they get frustated sometimes themselves. What they don't do is realize that they're happier and nicer people than the woman they idolize because they don't think that they're pissing away their lives doing nothing that makes an impact. They also don't notice that Elly's smirking goofball husband is on their side with respect to how good their lives are.

dreadedcandiru2: (Default)

As you know, a lot of people go on Coffee Talk in order to praise Lynn for being an astute observer of the human condition. They love to remind their fellows that they identify emotionally with anyone who isn't Mira or Thérèse and that their children remind them of the characters they see. They also cannot seem to see why anyone would seek to criticize the strip given how closely it parallels their experience. What enables them to do so cannot simply be dismissed as blind loyalty; there's a factor that I haven't covered that can help explain how regular people can avoid seeing how much this strip sucks: Lynn's admission that she doesn't agree with every stupid thing the Pattersons do. As an example, let's imagine that a strip that infuriates us is being read by a member of her target demographic. She remembers that Lynn doesn't endorse the Patterson lifestyle one hundred percent so even if what she sees gets on her nerves, she assumes that Lynn is taking Elly, Mike or Liz down a peg or two. It doesn't matter that the strip in question might be an occasion wherein Lynn wants us to sympathize with the Foob, the fan assumes she wants us not to so she feels quite confident in praising Lynn for her skill and questioning the people who tell her that her idol has feet of clay.

dreadedcandiru2: (Default)

As you know, Lynn’s fans fear and hate the day when they don’t get new material; that’s because, as has been said by wiser voices than my own, that they live for their daily hit of Foob. If Lynn were to do what she really probably wanted to do and retire, they’d be beside themselves with confusion and rage. They’d also look for someone to blame for the inevitable disappearance of the strip as a phenomenon. Sadly, they have a commonality: the hatred of critical voices. The same people who view the strip as being real when things that move or impress them happen call it a light-hearted romp when someone tells them to think about what they’re reading. They’re convinced that Lynn actually reads her mail and is heart-broken because people say her column is bad; this, they think, will cause her to give up creating new Foob for them to gush over so we haters are who’ll they blame when she decides she’s bored with the strip and wants to take up painting landscapes like a serious artist.

dreadedcandiru2: (Default)

As I said a while back, Lynn has officially declared that the new-runs are taking place in the present day. Granted, it’s a present day that has a rotary phone in the Pattermanse and flat screen TV in the sports bar John frequents but the Pattersons we see now are living in the year 2009. I’ve also mentioned that it would be difficult to get Lynn’s more fanatical apologists to realize this. In their minds, we’re back in the year 1980; a simpler time when values were different so we should stop criticizing the way the characters behave and just let behavior that was archaic even then just wash over us like zombies and idiots. That dog, as they say, don’t hunt; John and Elly were behind the curve modernity-wise back then and they did not live in the countryside despite what the Inmans and Anna Ms of Winnipeg would have us believe. They lived in a suburb forty minutes from downtown Toronto and they, as I said, were regarded as being old fashioned by their neighbors and friends. To see them act like they think it’s the Eisenhower administration her in the era of Obama is even more ridiculous and less defensible; to be told to stop being mean to Lynn and let her pass that off as normal is simply not permissible. If Lynn can say what she wants, we can too.

dreadedcandiru2: (Default)

As you know, there's been a lot of speculation as to when the new-runs are supposedly taking place. Some people think that we're seeing a distorted version of the 1980s while others think we're in a timeless void wherein the passage of time has no meaning. The thought that we're actually reading the adventures of a new group of Pattersons living in a retro-cool version of 2009 is one that few of us are willing to accept. Sadly, accept it we must for a while; Lynn's latest decree is that the new-runs are happening in the present day. This makes fools of all her gushing fans eager to see back into the Patterpast when they're actually reading what could be called Ultimate Foob. This also gives Lynn a nifty way to deflect criticism for the recent rash of re-reruns; when the strips we recently saw were reprinted last summer, we were meant to think that Elly was reminiscing about being a testy failure way back in 1980. She likely intends to explain their re-reoccurence as the misadventures of the Elly of Earth-2 for whom these things are happening for the first time. Since she can't really keep track of what she's doing, though, we can expect to see strips from after the start of the new-runs appearing soon all over again.

dreadedcandiru2: (Default)

As you know, the current incarnation of the Letter from Elly had become a Recipe from Elly owing to a combination of Lynn’s boredom with the idea of sending a weekly note from the Pattersons and a dislike of having to read all the feedback they generated. It now seems that the recipes themselves will be dropped. I’m, of course, basing this on a distinct lack of recipes from preferred sources in this week’s CT and the fact that the last two were not for meals Mommy and her smalls could make but arts and crafts projects that produce substitutes for store-bought items that are more expensive and messier than what they’re meant to substitute for. Given that the children’s book is due to arrive soon, I should think that she’ll start showing pictures of local pets with an invitation for her fans to show us their Farleys, Edgars, Dixies and other pets. It should be noted that if I’m right, there’ll be a distinct lack of pictures of cats owing to her belief that they’re sneaky and mean.

dreadedcandiru2: (DreadedCandiru2)

As I mentioned before, the new-runs have one commonality with the original strip: in both versions of history, you could be forgiven for assuming that the Pattersons don’t have a dog. Farley was pretty much a big, shaggy no-show while he was alive, after all: his fame, as we all know, was due to his unnecessarily heroic death. The buckets of crocodile tears the inept twits who had neither patience or respect for him when he was alive convinced a generation of unobservant suckers that he was some sort of wonder-dog that was the center of attention in the Pattermanse. Now that whoever’s left reading the new-runs are beginning to see how little he really mattered, it might occur to them that Lynn played them. Then again, they might be stampeded into blaming the mean, cruel people who insist that Lynn’s creation make sense and adhere to the moral precepts that we all must live with.

dreadedcandiru2: (Default)
As you might expect, the sort of person that usually gets a letter posted to Coffee Talk isn't all that discerning. They don't, for instance seem to notice that the new-run artwork is in pretty much the same style as the Declining Years. Either that, or they don't care. This is because they think they're seeing the real past of the Pattersons and are willing to endure the occasional long head, silhouette or five-panel strip that ends in a bad pun. Too bad for them their faith in Lynn is misplaced. Instead of getting a more complete look at the past, what they're getting is an alternate timeline. They, for instance, don't know (or possibly care) that Deanna isn't supposed to move for about another five years or so. Granted, she was an incidental character at the time but she became important later on so her history shouldn't be so lightly distorted just so Lynn can tell an unrealistic and disturbing story. It isn't too hard to see how they'd react to being told that Lynn altered history to suit herself: it's her thig and she can do what she wants with it. They're probably the same sort of people who don't mind that Lucas inserted the scene that had Greedo shoot first in his director's cut.

Profile

dreadedcandiru2: (Default)
dreadedcandiru2

June 2022

S M T W T F S
   123 4
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 02:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios